Change the world. Change our schools.


Live Blog: CSTP’s proposal
June 9, 2008, 11:40 am
Filed under: Basic Education Task Force, Olympia | Tags:

Posted by Heather
Time: 11:20am-11:40am

Group: Jeanne Harmon, Center for Strengthening the Teaching Profession

 

Ms. Harmon began with induction programs, picking up from the discussion begun during Dr. Bergeson’s first presentation. She briefly compared Washington’s induction program with Oregon, California and Connecticut, looking mostly at funding and structure. Ms. Harmon also advocated for state-wide mandatory induction for all new teachers to help reduce attrition rates. She raised the issue of public vs. private colleges, as 16 of the 22 degree-granting institutions in Washington are not state-funded.

 

Superintendent Kowalkowski asked about where certain “exemplar” districts funds comes from. Ms. Harmon’s answer: local levy and I-728 dollars.

 

Chairman Grimm asked about the selectivity of teacher training programs. Ms. Harmon responded that our system allows most applicants to earn certificates and relies on the marketplace to weed out low performers. Two other system models are 1) having high entrance requirements and allowing in a small group of applicants to teacher preparation programs, and 2) allowing in more applicants while having high exit requirements to earn a certificate.

 

Jennifer Wallace of the Professional Educator Standards Board (PESB) came forward and mentioned the four alternative certification pathways in Washington, as well as some upcoming PESB reports. Rep. Hunter asked about the number of candidates in alternative routes. Ms. Wallace said it’s roughly 120 per year.



Live Blog: Edmonds Education Association and Edmonds School District
June 9, 2008, 11:20 am
Filed under: Basic Education Task Force, Olympia | Tags:

Posted by Heather
Time: 11:05am-11:20am

Group: Edmonds Education Association and Edmonds School District

The folks from Edmonds focused on teacher compensation and made a proposal meant to move away from steps and lanes and toward a more performance-based model. The model includes five components: instruction (standards referenced), data-based instructional growth (meeting professional goals), professional development (and demonstration of mastery), new and challenging situations (stipends and/or additional support), and leadership/active participation (additional pay for additional responsibilities).

Rep. Hunter asked, “What about teachers who do not demonstrate competence?” The group offered an answer about helping struggling teachers improve, while not allowing those who are not improving to stay in the classroom ad infinitum.



Live Blog: Sup. Bergeson’s Proposal
June 9, 2008, 10:45 am
Filed under: Basic Education Task Force, Olympia | Tags:

Posted by Heather
Time: 9:15am-10:45am

Group: Superintendent of Public Instruction Terry Bergeson

Proposals for Quality Education Development, Compensation and Support

 

Dr. Bergeson was the lead-off presenter and came with a meaty proposal (100+ pages). The first chunk dealt with teacher training, retention and compensation. Her three main proposals were to 1) strengthen induction and professional development programs, and 2) develop a new compensation model, based on more than experience and education and offering additional pay for certain positions and obtaining results.

 

The presentation reflected the density of the proposal, taking more than 90 minutes and peppered with plenty of back and forth between the Task Force, Dr. Bergeson and her panel of experts (including Jeanne Harmon of the Center for Strengthening the Teaching Profession (CSTP), Jennifer Priddy of the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) and Jennifer Wallace of the Professional Educator Standards Board (PESB)). See the jump for a more detailed account of Dr. Bergeson’s presentation.

 

Pages: 1 2

Pages: 1 2

0 Comments


Tried and True Education Champ
March 24, 2008, 5:30 pm
Filed under: Olympia | Tags: ,

Sunday mornings are a casual affair in my household. As I sipped my coffee and read The Seattle Times, I came across a great article about Rep. Helen Sommers. I laughed a little as I read this line out loud to my roommate:

They quickly learned Sommers’ favorite word when it came to spending requests: no. She’d often put it more diplomatically, however, said Appropriations Vice Chairman Hans Dunshee. “She’d say, ‘Well, we’ll consider it.’ That meant you were dead.

My relationship with Helen began almost four years ago as her campaign manager. Many will remember her 2004 re-election campaign when the SEIU spent over $300,000 to try and unseat her, and lost. Much of what they say is true. She is unapologetically tough, incredibly sharp, and one of the few politicians I’ve met who does not speak unless she has something important to say. However there is a lot more to her than the word “no.”

Campaign life is tough. You are sleep deprived, live on junk food, and every day is Wednesday (because you worked the past two days and will work the next two days). This stressful work environment allows you to quickly see who a person really is. Helen was always upbeat, determined and ready to fight. Case in point, doorbelling. Most campaign managers have a tough time getting their candidate to doorbell; this was never the case with Helen. Even in the 90 degree heat, she doorbelled everyday for hours and never complained. I was always impressed with sharp wit, results-oriented approach to problem solving, and a sense of gratitude. And, she even found time to take a break during the chaos. She pushed me to take breaks and retreated to her garden regularly (even if it was only for 15 minutes before doorbelling).

It wasn’t until after the campaign, however, did I fully understand and appreciate what I was fighting for. I remember having dinner with Helen during the 2005 Legislative Session. She had just invited a UW scientist to present information to the Appropriations Committee on early brain research. She could not stop talking about how amazed she was and immediately began to discuss ways to invest in early learning programs. Helen was also a strong proponent of higher education. I remember telling her about my college loans. She asked me about my payment plan and interest rates and I told her that my current plan would have my loans paid off by 40ish. She looked at me, shocked, and began to brainstorm programs and investments that would target this growing problem.

She is one of the few people who get it —“it” being the link between quality education and socioeconomic development. This commitment coupled with her results-oriented tenacity made her an incredible force for education. For her, investing in education was not only based on the right to opportunity; it was a smart budget strategy for Washington state.

Thank you, Representative Sommers, for setting such a strong precedent in both leadership and commitment to education in Washington state.



Cutoff Day in Olympia
March 7, 2008, 1:14 pm
Filed under: Olympia | Tags:

We’ve reached cutoff day in Olympia!

Most of the bills I’m tracking for the League of Education Voters have passed the floor of the Senate or House.

Last night, I tuned in to TVW to view floor action in the Senate and House.  Lawmakers were working well past sundown in a rush to approve bills by today’s 5 p.m. deadline. Despite all those extra hours at work, legislators left two important early learning bills to the last minute — HB 3168, creating the new Washington Head Start program, and HB 2449, authorizing collective bargaining authority for child care center directors and workers.  

 

However, at 1:30 p.m. today, I caught Sen. McAuliffe speaking to the good merits of HB 3168.  Her colleagues agreed and voted unanimously to approve the bill to set the stage for the creation of the new Washington Head Start Program. I’m still watching the Senate for action on HB 2449, but I’m discouraged that it hasn’t made it onto the floor calendar as of 2 p.m.  

 

For play-by-play action, watch TVW’s live television feed. 

These include legislation to help students not on track to meet state graduation standards (SB 6673), require the Basic Education Finance Task Force to report back by Dec. 1, 2008 (SB 6879), and expand a program that provides accessible and affordable child care options for students attending our state’s public colleges and universities (HB 2582).